Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to footer

What are the hidden costs of owning a historic home in Minnesota?

Answered by Chris Deutsch, Founder & Editor
Licensed Minnesota Realtor #20382264 ·

The short answer

A $400,000 historic home in Minneapolis actually costs about $6,000-8,000 more per year to own than a $400,000 new construction home. That's $500-667 more per month.

On stage The 60-second answer

Captions on · Transcript below

The stage is set.

Chris's video answer is on its way. Until then, the short answer above says the same thing.

Read the transcript

The transcript posts with the video.

The longer answer

Where does it go?

Heating: Old homes with original windows and minimal insulation cost 30-50% more to heat. A new furnace helps, but the real savings come from insulation and windows — and those have to be done carefully to preserve character.

Insurance: Many insurers charge more for knob-and-tube wiring (if still present), older roofs, and plumbing. Some won't insure at all until updates are made.

Repairs: Everything costs more because you can't just go to Home Depot. Matching trim, repairing plaster, restoring windows — these require specialists.

Property taxes: Historic neighborhoods tend to have higher tax assessments because the land values are higher.

But here's the counter-argument: That same $400K historic home in Kingfield will likely appreciate $15,000-20,000 more over 10 years than a $400K new build in an outer suburb. The higher costs are partially — sometimes fully — offset by stronger appreciation.

Know the full math before you fall in love.

The next department over

What people in this spot usually ask next.

From the editor's desk

“As Founder and Editor, I review, correct, and stand behind every answer.”
— Chris Deutsch

Is your situation more specific than the market? That's the one worth talking through.