Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to footer

Minneapolis or St. Paul — where should we buy?

Answered by Chris Deutsch, Founder & Editor
Licensed Minnesota Realtor #20382264 ·

The short answer

They're twenty minutes and a full personality apart. Minneapolis runs newer, denser, faster. Think the chain of lakes, a bigger restaurant and job concentration, more condo and loft stock, and historically the more liquid resale market. St. Paul runs older and quieter: bigger lots for the dollar, Victorian and Craftsman streets Minneapolis can't match — Cathedral Hill, Crocus Hill, Mac-Groveland. It also has a neighborhood permanence where people buy once and stay decades.

On stage The 60-second answer

Captions on · Transcript below

The stage is set.

Chris's video answer is on its way. Until then, the short answer above says the same thing.

Read the transcript

The transcript posts with the video.

The longer answer

The trade-offs, honestly: Minneapolis generally costs more for less square footage and moves faster when you sell. St. Paul gives you more house and calmer blocks, with a slower resale pace and, as a rule of thumb, slightly higher property taxes.

The deciding question isn't which city is better — it's which Saturday is yours. Walking to a lake and a new restaurant: Minneapolis. A porch on a quiet street with a bakery three blocks over: St. Paul. Tell me your commute and your Saturday, and this decision mostly makes itself.

The next department over

What people in this spot usually ask next.

From the editor's desk

“As Founder and Editor, I review, correct, and stand behind every answer.”
— Chris Deutsch

Is your situation more specific than the market? That's the one worth talking through.