Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to footer

Should we rent out the house instead of selling it to pay for care?

Answered by Chris Deutsch, Founder & Editor
Licensed Minnesota Realtor #20382264 ·

The short answer

Sometimes it's the right call — but run three honest numbers before deciding, because the rental that "covers the care bill" on paper often doesn't in practice.

On stage The 60-second answer

Captions on · Transcript below

The stage is set.

Chris's video answer is on its way. Until then, the short answer above says the same thing.

Read the transcript

The transcript posts with the video.

The longer answer

First, the real net: rent minus taxes, insurance, management, and the repair appetite of an older house. A 1970s rambler doesn't stop writing bills because a tenant moved in. Second, the job: somebody becomes a landlord, usually the same adult child already managing everything else. Third — and this is the one households miss — the tax clock. The capital gains exclusion on a primary home generally requires having lived there two of the last five years. Rent the house long enough and that exclusion can quietly expire, which can turn a tax-free sale into a taxable one. Confirm the specifics with a CPA; I'm not one.

If you want, I'll pull what the house would actually rent for and what it would actually sell for, so the comparison is real instead of theoretical.

The next department over

What people in this spot usually ask next.

From the editor's desk

“As Founder and Editor, I review, correct, and stand behind every answer.”
— Chris Deutsch

Is your situation more specific than the market? That's the one worth talking through.